You mean one db, but multiple tables, per file?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Dustin Puryear <dustin@puryear-it.com>
wrote:
> rsync will handle changes in the text files easily. Also, for MySQL,
> consider a script which does a per-DB dump instead of a full dump to one
> file. Less stuff changes that way.
>
> --
> Puryear Information Technology, LLC
> Baton Rouge, LA * 225-706-8414
> http://www.puryear-it.com
>
> Author, "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers"
>   http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices
>
> Identity Management, LDAP, and Linux Integration
>
>
> Chris Jones wrote:
> > Probably only a few gigs a day, at the most...going by past experience.
> > I highly doubt all of it changes regularly.  There is a MySQL db that is
> > probably close to a gig, so probably back that up fully every day, but
> > as far as the files...an rsync incremental backup would probably be
> perfect.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Dustin Puryear <dustin@puryear-it.com
> > <mailto:dustin@puryear-it.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Ah. The real question is: How often does that 100GB change?
> >
> >     --
> >     Puryear Information Technology, LLC
> >     Baton Rouge, LA * 225-706-8414
> >     http://www.puryear-it.com
> >
> >     Author, "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers"
> >       http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices
> >
> >     Identity Management, LDAP, and Linux Integration
> >
> >
> >     Chris Jones wrote:
> >      > I found out late last night that the amount of data is fairly
> >      > significant, so I'm thinking rsync would be the better option,
> >     even over
> >      > LAN.  It's over 100GB of data, so it would be a lot of stress on
> >     all the
> >      > hardware to back that up nightly.  It might be better to run
> rsync
> >      > regularly, and maybe have the backup server archive it on a
> regular
> >      > basis with tar/gz.  I'll also check out that BackupPC software,
> >     it looks
> >      > really nice.  Especially with the web interface that lets you
> >     manage it,
> >      > makes it almost like a commercial product like BackupExec.
> >      >
> >      > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Dustin Puryear
> >     <dustin@puryear-it.com <mailto:dustin@puryear-it.com>
> >      > <mailto:dustin@puryear-it.com <mailto:dustin@puryear-it.com>>>
> wrote:
> >      >
> >      >     I've never been a big a fan of the 'local tar via crontab'
> >     approach.
> >      >     What about using something like BackupPC? It's much smarter
> >     in the way
> >      >     it uses disk space, can use rsync, and works on- or off-site.
> >     We use it
> >      >     all the time. Also, you can setup pre- and post-jobs for
> >     things like
> >      >     running mysqldump.
> >      >
> >      >     --
> >      >     Puryear Information Technology, LLC
> >      >     Baton Rouge, LA * 225-706-8414
> >      >     http://www.puryear-it.com
> >      >
> >      >     Author, "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers"
> >      >       http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices
> >      >
> >      >     Identity Management, LDAP, and Linux Integration
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >     Chris Jones wrote:
> >      >      > I have a client that's needing to back up their linux web
> >     servers, so
> >      >      > I'm thinking of recommending an additional server.  Set it
> >     up as
> >      >     an NFS
> >      >      > server, and let the other servers mount it.
> >      >      >
> >      >      > Write a bash script to essentially:
> >      >      > use mysqldump to dump the databases to files
> >      >      > tar/gz the web folder, email folders, and probably /etc to
> >     a file
> >      >     on the NFS
> >      >      > put the date into the filenames it generates, and have it
> >     delete
> >      >     backups
> >      >      > that are over, say 14 days old
> >      >      >
> >      >      > And then put the script into cron to run daily, every 6
> >     hours, or
> >      >      > whatever...
> >      >      >
> >      >      >
> >      >      >
> >      >      > Is this a good solution?  Does anybody know a better way?
>  Can
> >      >     this be
> >      >      > done on a live system, without having to take everything
> >     offline
> >      >     first?
> >      >      >
> >      >      > Eventually they might want to do offsite backup and have
> >     hot spare
> >      >      > servers in a data center somewhere that they could use for
> >     disaster
> >      >      > recovery, I'm thinking rsync would be perfect if this need
> >     arises.
> >      >     ___________________
> >      >     Nolug mailing list
> >      >     nolug@nolug.org <mailto:nolug@nolug.org>
> >     <mailto:nolug@nolug.org <mailto:nolug@nolug.org>>
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > --
> >      > Chris Jones
> >      > http://www.industrialarmy.com
> >     ___________________
> >     Nolug mailing list
> >     nolug@nolug.org <mailto:nolug@nolug.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chris Jones
> > http://www.industrialarmy.com
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>
-- Chris Jones http://www.industrialarmy.com ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 02/15/08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST