... which are just two different ways to structure your code. PHP is the
language, not the pattern. Which is the point: php is already a
language, and a templating one at that, so why bother inventing another
language on top of it, together with learning curve and overhead?
http://www.phppatterns.com/docs/design/templates_and_template_engines
BTW: How've you been, Joey?
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 09:22 -0500, Joey Kelly wrote:
> On Friday 18 April 2008 08:12:56 am Christopher M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > As for a template engine, why not just use php? That's what php was
> > designed for, after all. I mean, respectfully, why bother to learn the
> > arcanities of a templating language like smarty, when you already are
> > using one with php?
> >
>
> Pipeline vs. callback: http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/08/21/templating.html
>
>
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 04/18/08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST