On 06/26/08 10:23, Dustin Puryear wrote:
> The whole top-posting vs. bottom-posting deal is a relic. Fighting for
> or against it is not unlike trying to fight popular culture's use of the
> term "hacker". In both cases it's a done deal, the battle is over and
> has been since the 90's, and we should all move on. That said, a lot of
> people still dislike top-posting and some people also dislike how the
> term "hacker" is used, but it's something that just has to be lived with
> now. :)
"We" were winning until gmail was made public...
> I'm a top-poster. To be honest, I find it tedious to have to scroll down
> several pages to read someone's comments much more than just skimming
> through a message thread easily by reading what's at the top of my
> screen.
That's why snipping is an integral part of mid-/bottom-posting.
> Some people disagree and feel that top-posting whacks out the
> conversation. Either way.
Yes, it does.
Anyway, Thunderbird places the cursor at the bottom of the compose
window, ripe and ready for bottom-posting. Why do you spend the
(admittedly slight) extra effort to move the cursor to the top of
the window?
-- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed." ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 06/26/08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST