I still think that OE had the most stable IMAP client. As a constant TB
user, I think that TB has ONLY NOW matched how well OE worked with IMAP.
-- Dustin Puryear President and Sr. Consultant Puryear Information Technology, LLC 225-706-8414 x112 http://www.puryear-it.com Author, "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers" http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices/ B. Estrade wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 01:14:27PM -0500, Petri Laihonen wrote: >> Ron Johnson wrote: >>> On 07/30/08 12:23, B. Estrade wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:56:55AM -0500, Jeremy (mailing list box) >>>> wrote: >>>>> Ron Johnson wrote: >>>>>> With prices like that, you know it won't be populated by people who >>>>>> normally go to Cons. >>>>>> >>>>> Yeah, it will be full of PHBs and MBA computer geek wannabes in suits. >>>> What's a PHB? >>> A person who uses Mutt and doesn't know what a PHB is? The shame, the >>> shame!!! No more Unix for you. Back to OE and IE6... >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointy-Haired_Boss >> What is OE? > > My guess is Outlook Express - the piece of crap that made me decided to kick M$ once and for all back in late 2000 (for FreeBSD :). > >> ___________________ >> Nolug mailing list >> nolug@nolug.org > ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 07/31/08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST