John Souvestre wrote:
> Distribution is only one of the rights. The copyright might disallow the
> patches to start with.
You have to operate on the assumption that the author permits patches.
We assume that no one patches without that being permitted.
> You seem to be oblivious to the concept that publishing patches to a program can
> cause large financial problems for other users and/or the author. In the former
> case, your patches might not work correctly. Since you claim to own them you
> should be prepared to pay for the losses they cause.
>
> In the latter case, the original author might suffer because of loss of
> reputation, time spent on technical support, and loss of income from his
> extended warranty plan. So you should be prepared for him to sue you, too.
>
One can legally write the software license to limit liability. In
fact, most commercial EULAs limit liability to the cost of the software
when purchased, not to any incidental losses.
J
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 12/14/08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST