"John Souvestre" <johns@sstar.com> writes:
> The distinction between software and hardware becomes somewhat blurry when you
> start talking about custom designed ASIC's. Some software can even be patented.
I was under the (mis?) understanding that since business process patents
had been overturned, software patents had little basis as well.
Rejecting a landmark 1998 case that allowed financial firms and
others to patent ideas and processes in addition to things and
machines, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in
Washington, voted 9-3 that patents should be limited to "physical
objects or substances" and not be awarded to "abstractions" like a
bank's risk-hedging strategy. (See http://xrl.us/o3jfj)
Also http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2008/11/18/95589.htm
Mark.
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 12/15/08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST