Hello,
http://broadcastengineering.com/ar/broadcasting_open_source_development/index.htm
This was a very interesting article.
Some comments:
- "Not just free as in “freeware” distributed at no cost, but free
in the sense that the source code is made available to anyone who
wants it."
Although it is implied in paragraph 3, I think that it should be
made explicit to those not "in the know" that OSS is copyrighted.
- "Critics also point out that, while some programs in the Open Source
community are well supported, other programs have relatively small
followings and support is at the whim of the developers."
"Open Source supporters reply that the same arguments can be applied
to commercially available software..."
Thank you for making the same point about closed-source s/w (CSS).
It must also be emphasized that if the company developing CSS goes
out of business, you're stuck. If the developer of OSS walks away,
it's ok, since "you" (or your designee) has the source code to
keep the project alive.
- Proprietary Digital Rights Management schemes (via government
mandates) may (for all intents and purposes) kill certain OSS
projects, like Linux, GNOME & KDE. This is because CSS DRM
mechanisms would be needed to run software. (Fritz Hollings
is Evil.)
Sincerely,
Ron
-- +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ron Johnson, Jr. mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net | | Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson | | | | "What other evidence do you have that they are terrorists, | | other than that they trained in these camps?" | | 17-Sep-2002 Katie Couric to an FBI agent regarding the 5 | | men arrested near Buffalo NY | +------------------------------------------------------------+ ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 10/05/02
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST