Well, there's no such thing as raid10 with 2 drives. You need at least 4
drives for raid10. With 2 drives it would be raid1. Or raid0, but only a
fool would put important data on a raid0. ;) raid0 is best for use as a
temporary place for data processing. Raid5 is the best of both worlds, and
is the most cost effective.
On Apr 10, 2010 1:41 PM, "Joey Kelly" <joey@joeykelly.net> wrote:
On Sat April 10 2010 1:29 pm, Petri Laihonen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Joey Kelly <joey@joeykelly.net> wrote:
> > On Sat April 10 2010 1...
OK, let me be less cryptic.
RAID5 with 3 drives, or RAID10 with two... fine, lose one drive, you're
still
OK. Forget I even said anything.
BUT... I do have to step in and complain loudly about software RAID. If you
don't care about your data, feel free to set up software RAID.
The same thing goes for Fake RAID. If you like your data and want to keep
it,
get a real controller.
-- Joey Kelly Minister of the Gospel and Linux Consultant http://joeykelly.net ___________________... ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 04/10/10
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 04/10/10 EDT