The kind of people who would be implementing something of that scale
will already know that, too. ;)
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Jeremy Sliwinski (mailing list
account) <listbox@unix-boy.com> wrote:
> On 4/10/2010 4:15 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
>>
>> Yeah and you work at Cox. LOL Exchange clusters... We're lucky if
>> we can get our clients to even run Exchange, far too many are
>> perfectly happy with POP email from their ISP. But a single computer
>> running a standalone Exchange installation for a company of 25 or less
>> employees isn't going to need RAID10.
>
> I know, dude... I was taking more of an issue with the statement that RAID
> 5 is the best of both worlds... I think you need to qualify that
> statement. Again, depending on what your application is, RAID 5 can be the
> devil.
>
> J
>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>
-- Chris Jones http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 04/10/10
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 04/10/10 EDT