For that, an lvm2 "array" (effectively RAID 0) backed up by an
external drive or two (for example, a dual drive enclosure who's
drives are their own lvm2 "array" is IMHO perfectly adequate.
On 2010-04-10 16:47, Shane Russo wrote:
> I have to agree. For a high availability enviroment server then yes raid
> 5 is way to slow. But for me just as a home file server raid 5 is way
> more economical than getting 4 drives and 2/3 the capacity with a raid 10.
>
-- Dissent is patriotic, remember? ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 04/10/10
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 04/10/10 EDT