Re: [Nolug] IPV4 vs. IPV6 interesting fact..

Fret not, old man. Since 340 undecillion is enough for anybody,
ICANN will dole out the addresses in just as stupid a fashion as
they doled out the IPv4 range...

On 06/02/2010 01:31 PM, -ray wrote:
>
> That's 340 undecillion, 282 decillion, 366 nonillion, 920 octillion, 938
> septillion, 463 sextillion, 463 quintillion, 374 quadrillion, 607
> trillion, 431 billion, 768 million, 211 thousand and 456.
>
> I read it's enough to assign an IP to every particle in the solar
> system. I won't be greedy... I just want enough for every particle in my
> body :)
>
> ray
>
>
> On Sun, 30 May 2010, Dustin Hinton wrote:
>
>> Ipv4= *2^32* (*4,294,967,296*) unique IPv4 adresses available.
>>
>> Vs.
>>
>> ipv6=2^128 (*340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456) *unique
>> IPv6 adresses available.
>>
>> Wow.. That's a big upgrade..
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Dustin Hinton
>> I.T. Sales Associate
>>
>> F1 Communications, L.L.C.
>> 1512 Edwards Ave. Suite 3
>> New Orleans, LA. 70123
>> Office: 504.455.5552
>> Cell: 985.640.4024
>> O-Fax: 504.304.7898
>> E-Fax: 866.316.3593
>> Dustin@f1solutions.net
>>
>> On May 30, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Joey Kelly <> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat May 29 2010 5:48 pm, Charles Jouglard wrote:
>>
>> Depending on which online IPV4 depletion calculator you look at there
>> is a
>>
>> Y2K type push for action. Several online depletion calculators show we
>> are
>>
>> right at less then two years before all of the IPV4 IPs will be depleted.
>>

-- 
Dissent is patriotic, remember?
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org