Re: [Nolug] Go

From: joe jonass <jdj2005_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:36:45 -0600
Message-ID: <CACcZnXipL33FPf8shCPYvz1x_vTKn70RDVORhDGA1Qb8ARM4oQ@mail.gmail.com>

One of the blogs at the site says that it is geared for concurrent
programming and not parallelism (
http://blog.golang.org/concurrency-is-not-parallelism). It would be
interesting to write a 'go' application that handles alot of request and
see if it distributes it across the cores.

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:16 PM, John Souvestre <johns@sstar.com> wrote:

> Hi Joe.
>
>
>
> Itís a relatively new language which some Google people designed as a
> replacement for C and possibly other systems languages. Besides a simpler,
> cleaner syntax it includes built-in primitives for concurrency.
>
>
>
> At the moment my interest is mainly academic. Iím interested in languages
> which make it easier to take advantage of multi-core processors.
>
>
>
> John
>
> John Souvestre - New Orleans LA - (504) 454-0899
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-nolug@stoney.kellynet.org [mailto:
> owner-nolug@stoney.kellynet.org] *On Behalf Of *joe jonass
> *Sent:* Thu, December 12, 2013 2:11 pm
> *To:* nolug@nolug.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Nolug] Go
>
>
>
> Never heard of it. Is there a particular problem or idea that you are
> trying to match with software, paradigm, or are you looking at it from a
> academic point of view?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:55 AM, John Souvestre <johns@sstar.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
>
>
> Iím also looking at the programming language Go. I was wondering if
> anyone here was using it?
>
>
>
> John
>
> John Souvestre - New Orleans LA - (504) 454-0899
>
>
>
>
>

___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 12/12/13

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/12/13 EST