Re: [Nolug] SSL bug

From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:36:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAAwwbX+BaXEnUrOzF+-u4wtzXLainutarsRB=3TvMrrF7JhWQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Joey Kelly <joey@joeykelly.net> wrote:

> On 04/09/2014 04:27 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Do CA certificates need to be recreated?
>

It is impossible without having violated basic Crypto 101 key hygene rules.
So no current public CA that claims to be following the security
standards, could have a CA certificate compromised, unless they were
quite negligent.

Should never issue certificates that have a Policy definition/Extended key
usage allowing the certificate to be used for both Key agreement/Data
encipherment AND for Certificate signing (or CRL Signing).

CA signing keys should never be loaded onto a webserver.
Always sign a separate certificate that has a different key from the
certificate signing key.

>
>
> If you created them with a vulnerable OpenSSL version, then yes. I've
> got one to redo myself.
>
>
> --
> Joey Kelly
> Minister of the Gospel and Linux Consultant
> http://joeykelly.net
> 504-239-6550
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>

-- 
-Mysid
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 04/09/14

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 04/09/14 EDT