Re: [Nolug] Unix spam filtering w/o SpamAssassin?

From: scotth_at_scottharney.com
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:59:24 -0500
Message-ID: <87pt9pa23n.fsf@minorthreat.local.lan>

Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:

> On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 09:44 -0500, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
>> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
>>
>> > Since SA is written in Perl (i.e. is slow),
>>
>> Gee... You like language wars, don't you?
>
> Slower than directly-executed binaries.
>
>> The only slowness is in the startup. You can get around this by
>> running SA as a daemon (via spamd) and client (spamc).
>
> Is there a spamd for each user?
>
>>From top(1):
> 24525 me 15 0 29100 25m 4360 S 0.0 2.6 0:00.86 spamd
> 21353 root 16 0 29252 25m 4164 S 0.0 2.6 0:05.91 spamd

You're doing something "weird". There should be just one spamd:
root 23277 0.0 0.4 20324 4084 ? S Mar18 2:54 /usr/bin/spamd -d -r /var/run/spamd.pid -a -c

spamc client connections are run and connect to spamd. There's a
number of ways to launch spamc, in my case, qmail-scanner-queue.pl
feeds incoming messages to spamc. procmail is often used to do it as
well. As always man pages have the details.

-- 
Scott Harney<scotth@scottharney.com>
"Asking the wrong questions is the leading cause of wrong answers"
gpg key fingerprint=7125 0BD3 8EC4 08D7 321D CEE9 F024 7DA6 0BC7 94E5
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 04/30/04

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST