Re: [Nolug] redhat upgrade for web server

That's about what I was thinking - was gonna go Fedora since I had a
download of it.

Archiving the tweaked config files and backing up the htdocs and other
apache directories are what I had planned, just was making sure.

Thanks again :)

-ray wrote:

>And i would not put a new box in production at RH9.0, since it's been
>discontinued. If you're sticking with Redhat (and don't have issues with
>a 2.6 kernel), i would go with Fedora Core 2.
>
>ray
>
>
>On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, krunk wrote:
>
>
>
>>That's almost 2 version jumps, I'd backup the tweaked config files,
>>reformat and go from scratch.
>>
>>On Jun 28, 2004, at 1:15 PM, Bart wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I have a webserver here at work that is running RH 7.3 and we were
>>>looking to upgrade it to RH9.0.
>>>I am looking to migrate our site to use something like phpWebsite and
>>>didn't have mySQL and some of the other pieces of software needed. I
>>>was wondering if upgrading would allow me to add on the packages I
>>>would need/want and still save the user account settings and tweak
>>>downs that were made or if possibly archiving what I have and
>>>reformatting would be the way to go.
>>>Also, would anyone recommend using LAMP to set this up properly? I
>>>did some reading on it, but forgot the supported flavors/versions.
>>>
>>>Bart
>>>
>>>___________________
>>>Nolug mailing list
>>>nolug@nolug.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>___________________
>>Nolug mailing list
>>nolug@nolug.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 06/28/04