I use debian, it's solid enough. Don't let the installer scare you. If
you know your hardware it's one of the easiest/fastest installs I know.
. . . now if I can just get a mail server working, hehe.
On Jun 29, 2004, at 3:08 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 17:32 -0500, -ray wrote:
>> And i would not put a new box in production at RH9.0, since it's been
>> discontinued. If you're sticking with Redhat (and don't have issues
>> with
>> a 2.6 kernel), i would go with Fedora Core 2.
>
> Note that RH doesn't offer support of FC.
>
> If you want support, security fixes, etc in the RPM world, go with
> Progeny or SuSE.
> http://transition.progeny.com/
>
> Of course, Real Geeks would go to Debian, or it's cousin, Libranet
> 2.8.1. It's got a GUI installer, and if the package versions are
> too old, you can migrate to straight Debian.
> http://www.libranet.com/features.html
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net
> Jefferson, LA USA
>
> "There's nothing wrong with the average person that a good
> psychiatrist can't exaggerate."
> Toronto Star Newspaper
>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 06/29/04
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST