Re: [Nolug] networking question

From: Joey Kelly <joey_at_joeykelly.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:49:07 -0500
Message-Id: <200408061749.07458.joey@joeykelly.net>

>
> Free advice:
> If the problem you're trying to solve is that some users need to telnet
> to the AS400 from the outside world, you'd be far better off giving them
> shells on the firewall (or another box behind it via port forwarding)
> and forcing^H^H^Hteaching them to use putty to ssh to that box and then
> telnet to the AS400 behind the firewall.

That's exactly what I tried to do today. I thought about doing Ray's
suggestion with tcpdump, but ran out of time. Saturday I need to do
something, or call the provider back in Monday morning to put stuff back the
way it was before we broke the existing tangle of VPNs. I thought all of them
could go away, but apparently not (which is why I'm having to allow external
access again).

> unencrypted telnet = bad. Sticking core infrastructure like an AS400
> outside of a firewall = bad.

Believe it or not, a local provider had the AS/400 effectively outside of the
firewall for 5 years already. Putting it out there again for another 4 months
(the box is going away at the end of the year) isn't going to matter much at
this point.

> The above idea mitigates both issues. If
> you know where the user's will be originating ssh sessions from then you
> can use the firewall or tcp-wrappers to tighten things up further.

That I planned to do already.

-- 
Joey Kelly
< Minister of the Gospel | Linux Consultant >
http://joeykelly.net
"I may have invented it, but Bill made it famous."
 --- David Bradley, the IBM employee that invented CTRL-ALT-DEL
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 08/06/04

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST