Mischa Krilov wrote:
> I do plan on using both ClamAV and SpamAssassin, unless there's better
> alternatives. I know Kaspersky has a for-pay Linux scanner, but it
> doesn't fit my needs at this point in time. As I understand it, Clam
> is a more-or-less drop-it-in-and-it-works (just keep it updated), sort
> of solution, but SpamAssassin needs training to be at maximum
> effectiveness, right?
ClamAV actually has a daemon that runs and automatically updates the
scanner DB.
SpamAssassin works fairly well without training, but customisation and
training make it work even better.
Mark.
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 11/07/04
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST