Re: [Nolug] Tulane

From: Jeremy (mailing list box) <listbox_at_unix-boy.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 01:15:48 -0600
Message-ID: <42183924.4070605@unix-boy.com>

-ray wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Shannon Roddy wrote:
>
>> I should also mention that our target bandwidth is a minimum of 48
>> mbps 24x7 back to Caltech via I2. Basically 1/3 OC3 speed which
>> looking at the utilization of LaNet and the Abilene backbone, we
>> should be able to do. LSU has set up an 80 mbit pipe for us on their
>> traffic shaper but we are still seeing only T1 speeds or so. My
>> suspicion is that the bottleneck is at LSU, but I have no numbers to
>> conclude this without doubt.
>
>
> Cool.... good to see some increased usage on the LaNet OC3. Increased
> usage == justification of cost. Wow, the Tulane OC3 is very
> under-utilized...i wonder who's footing the bill for that.
>
> ray

Clearly they are paying more in "technology fees" than we are (I'm a
student at UNO) paying at the public Universities...

Of course, for more than $20k or so per year (its probably more now), I
would expect connectivity that good.

J
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 02/20/05

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST