Mikey <mraeder@payneservices.com> writes:
Of course, eggdrop itself could have exploitable flaws which would
allow a remote user to access and compromise it. then a "sniff" would
not have necessarily occurred.
> Joey Kelly wrote:
>
> > Anyone know of any local exploits for FreeBSD? In particular,
> > FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE #2
> > Here's the deal... one of our egddrop shells was sniffed. Scott says
> > that the only way to sniff is to have elevated privileges, to put
> > the nic into promiscuous mode.
> > Anyone have any thoughts about this?
>
> You do need to have privilages to run a sniffer on FreeBSD for
> programs like "sniff", "sniffit, "queso", etc.
>
> --
> Since-beer-leekz, |If this were an actual emergency, Mikey
> |we would have all fled in terror
> http://24.17.118.246:81 |and you would not have been notified
>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
-- Scott Harney <scott_harney@yahoo.com> Broadband Services Manager (LA) Charter Communications ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 01/03/02
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST