I always use 10.0.0.x for my lans
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nolug@patientcarerx.com
[mailto:owner-nolug@patientcarerx.com]On Behalf Of Dave Prentice
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 9:51 AM
To: nolug@patientcarerx.com
Subject: Re: [Nolug] Internal connection problem
Please give me some sample numbers in the form xxx.xx.x.xxx. I'm not
familiar with 10/8 and 172.16/24.
Thanks,
Dave Prentice
prentice@instruction.com
http://www.originsresource.org
http://www.prenticenet.com/home/dprentice
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Sliwinski <badmagicnumber@telocity.com>
To: nolug@patientcarerx.com <nolug@patientcarerx.com>
Date: Sunday, January 20, 2002 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Nolug] Internal connection problem
>On Sun, 20 January 2002, Dave Prentice wrote:
>> Ron,
>> When I get back to school I'll try your plan to change from
>> 192.168.0.xxx to 192.168.somethingelse.xxx.
>
>You may consider switch to the 10/8 or 172.16/24 networks instead. You may
have problems with routing if you use the same subnet on both sides of the
firewall.
>
>-Jeremy
>
>
>___________________
>Nolug mailing list
>nolug@nolug.org
>
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 01/21/02
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST