On 08/01/08 09:04, Mischa D. Krilov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:
>> Unless you're joking, how so? IOW, how is a didgeridoo more or less analog
>> than a bongo or clapping hands or piano or flute or pipe organ or calliope?
>
> I meant "more analog" in the larger sense of "less digital" or "more
> organic and less easily mechanically reproduced." Part of the sound of
> a didj is generated from the mouth, tongue, and throat of the player.
> Each instrument is effectively unique, too- so you literally can not
> have the same music from two different players or instruments.
Ah. Since all(?) non-electronic (and even some older electronic)
musical instruments are by-definition analog, the word "organic"
seems to much more accurately describe what you mean.
-- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Scientists are people, too. IOW, they also "crave power, money, respect, and influence, and they also fear for their jobs. Each can be a healthy motivator, but each has the ability to turn a good scientist into a bad one; and in some cases, they can turn a good scientist into a charlatan." http://thefutureofthings.com/book/3/the-bomb-that-never-was.html ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 08/01/08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST