On 12/08/08 13:56, Petri Laihonen wrote:
> Ron,
>
> you asked about which wiki I found the comparison....
> It was this: http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/MySQL_vs_PostgreSQL
>
>
> And more specifically in my case:
>
> MySQL supports INSERT IGNORE and REPLACE statements which inserts if a
> row exists and does nothing otherwise or replaces the current row,
> respectively.
<Shakes my head in disgust.>
> PostgreSQL supports neither of these statements and suggests using
> stored procedures to get around the lack of these statements. However,
> there are major shortcomings:
>
> There was some other insert method in mysql addition to the above, but I
> do not remember it now. But the functionality was such that the row gets
> updated if it exists, otherwise inserted.
At the worst times, MySQL makes things too sloppily easy for the
programmer, and then silents destroys or mangles data.
Three examples from a 10-day old post to ArsTechnica:
http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6330927813/m/377006385931
mysql> create table test (id int auto_increment not null,
primary key (id)) engine = InnoDB;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> insert into test values (0);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from test;
+----+
| id |
+----+
| 1 |
+----+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Illegal DATETIME, DATE, or TIMESTAMP values are converted to the
“zero” value of the appropriate type ('0000-00-00 00:00:00' or
'0000-00-00');
If ALTER TABLE for an InnoDB table results in changes to column
values (for example, because a column is truncated), InnoDB's
FOREIGN KEY constraint checks do not notice possible violations
caused by changing the values;
-- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA How does being physically handicapped make me Differently-Abled? What different abilities do I have? ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 12/08/08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST