On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:47:04PM -0600, Joey Kelly wrote:
> > What about rsync over ssh?
>
> I was going to put my two cents in last week, but since you mentioned my
> solution, I guess I can chime in now.
>
> As I understand it, John's got a non-homogeneous network. Each Linux distro
> puts things in a different spot, plus there's FreeBSD to contend with. I had a
What's to contend with FreeBSD that isn't worse that a non-standard
Linux environment? :P
> similar setup some time back, and I scripted for each target.
>
> Basically this is a "make" setup... there is a master, and updates are pushed
> to the slaves using some sort of makefile. It works, but I'm not convinced
> it's the smartest approach.
This makes using subversion sound like not such a bad idea. Each box
would be responsible for the checkout and execution - even the per-box
scripts could be kept in the repo, so those could be updated on the
fly as well.
>
> Part two of his project... I would use KDE's Konqueror to mount the remote
> boxen via fish, probably.
I still think mounting an fs is a bad idea, but I am not as familiar
with the situation as you.
Brett
>
> --
> Joey Kelly
> < Minister of the Gospel | Linux Consultant >
> 01101101 01101101 01101100 01101010 00110100
> http://joeykelly.net
>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
-- B. Estrade Louisiana Optical Network Initiative +1.225.578.1920 aim: bz743 :wq ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 01/05/09
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 02/17/09 EST