And gmail is still in beta.
you should come to your own conclusions instead of reading a blanket
faq from newbland.
samba4 works fine for my customers. I don't mind supporting it though.
You should know that unless forced to by circumstance no one with a
responsible mindset would want to say "Yes this will work 100% for you
I guarantee. If you have any problems feel free to whine away before
you follow any directions or read any disclaimers."
What do you think though?
What doesn't work in samba4 for the use case of applying GPOs?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jeremy Sliwinski (mailing list
account) <listbox@unix-boy.com> wrote:
> Dennis J Harrison Jr wrote:
>>
>> samba4 has long had support for group policies for any ou.
>>
>> Just rig it up then run dsa.msc to load the snap-in.
>>
>
> From the Samba site:
>
> Can I use Samba 4 on my production server right now?
>
> No. Samba 4 is still under heavy development. Samba 4 is not due to replace
> Samba 3 soon. Many of the required core features are present, but the code
> is still alpha and user tools as well as some core features are still
> missing.
>
> ---
>
> In other words, Samba still is not a replacement for a Windows server with
> AD and GPOs.
>
> J
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 01/19/09
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 02/17/09 EST