Re: [Nolug] A week with MOSSO

From: Dennis J Harrison Jr <dennisharrison_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:16:05 -0500
Message-ID: <6e8b29e0904291416h3844a05tedbbac658db9ab6d@mail.gmail.com>

I actually wasn't aware that rackspace bought mosso as well. I
thought it was an internal development by a division of rackspace.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Jonathan Roberts <gremln007@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I am thinking of another acquisition...
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Petri Laihonen <pietu@weblizards.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> rackspace bought both Mosso and Slicehost almost at the same time....
>>
>> Petri
>>
>>
>> Jonathan Roberts wrote:
>> > Dennis,
>> >
>> > Are you sure this is really slicehost?  Didn't Rackspace have a Mosso
>> > offering like this prior to slicehost?
>> >
>> > Just curious...
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Dennis J Harrison Jr
>> > <dennisharrison@gmail.com <mailto:dennisharrison@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Just FYI:
>> >
>> >     Mosso is the offering from rackspace based on their purchase of
>> >     slicehost last year.  It is cheaper then slicehost and the testmaker
>> >     tests we have running for freeswitch, apache and python are showing
>> >     that we are about 22% faster on the 15.5gb vm from mosso as opposed
>> > to
>> >     the 15.5gb slice we have at slicehost.
>> >
>> >     I am really surprised by this, because rdns for everything at mosso
>> > is
>> >     slicehost.  And I know it's a one-off...  Although the dns tool at
>> >     mosso sucks in comparison to everything else i've seen :)
>> >
>> >     Anyhow, I know there are a few devs on the list.  Who knows how long
>> >     performance will be acceptable before they overcrowd the servers.
>> >     They seem to be using an ultra patched xen 3.2 as the hypervisors,
>> > so
>> >     hopefully the cpu pri gets tuned well enough per domU.
>> >     ___________________
>> >     Nolug mailing list
>> >     nolug@nolug.org <mailto:nolug@nolug.org>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>> > is
>> > believed to be clean.
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> ___________________
>> Nolug mailing list
>> nolug@nolug.org
>
>
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 04/29/09

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 08/06/09 EDT