Re: [Nolug] A week with MOSSO

From: Petri Laihonen <pietu_at_weblizards.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:43:59 -0500
Message-ID: <49F8E63F.5090100@weblizards.net>

Hmm.....
It well may be possible...... I just assumed mosso was acquired as
well, since some years back I did not notice any mention to rackspace on
their site, neither there were any references to mosso at rackspace
site. All these references and "cross information" appeared about same
time Rackspace bought slicehost.

Petri

Dennis J Harrison Jr wrote:
> I actually wasn't aware that rackspace bought mosso as well. I
> thought it was an internal development by a division of rackspace.
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Jonathan Roberts <gremln007@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think I am thinking of another acquisition...
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Petri Laihonen <pietu@weblizards.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> rackspace bought both Mosso and Slicehost almost at the same time....
>>>
>>> Petri
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan Roberts wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dennis,
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure this is really slicehost? Didn't Rackspace have a Mosso
>>>> offering like this prior to slicehost?
>>>>
>>>> Just curious...
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Dennis J Harrison Jr
>>>> <dennisharrison@gmail.com <mailto:dennisharrison@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just FYI:
>>>>
>>>> Mosso is the offering from rackspace based on their purchase of
>>>> slicehost last year. It is cheaper then slicehost and the testmaker
>>>> tests we have running for freeswitch, apache and python are showing
>>>> that we are about 22% faster on the 15.5gb vm from mosso as opposed
>>>> to
>>>> the 15.5gb slice we have at slicehost.
>>>>
>>>> I am really surprised by this, because rdns for everything at mosso
>>>> is
>>>> slicehost. And I know it's a one-off... Although the dns tool at
>>>> mosso sucks in comparison to everything else i've seen :)
>>>>
>>>> Anyhow, I know there are a few devs on the list. Who knows how long
>>>> performance will be acceptable before they overcrowd the servers.
>>>> They seem to be using an ultra patched xen 3.2 as the hypervisors,
>>>> so
>>>> hopefully the cpu pri gets tuned well enough per domU.
>>>> ___________________
>>>> Nolug mailing list
>>>> nolug@nolug.org <mailto:nolug@nolug.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>>> is
>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>> believed to be clean.
>>>
>>> ___________________
>>> Nolug mailing list
>>> nolug@nolug.org
>>>
>>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 04/29/09

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 08/06/09 EDT