Re: [Nolug] A week with MOSSO

Rather then conjecture I just send an email to founders@mosso.com to
see. I'll postback when they reply.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Petri Laihonen <pietu@weblizards.net> wrote:
> Hmm.....
> It well may be possible......   I just assumed mosso was acquired as
> well, since some years back I did not notice any mention to rackspace on
> their site, neither there were any references to mosso at rackspace
> site. All these references and "cross information" appeared about same
> time Rackspace bought slicehost.
>
> Petri
>
> Dennis J Harrison Jr wrote:
>> I actually wasn't aware that rackspace bought mosso as well.  I
>> thought it was an internal development by a division of rackspace.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Jonathan Roberts <gremln007@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think I am thinking of another acquisition...
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Petri Laihonen <pietu@weblizards.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> rackspace bought both Mosso and Slicehost almost at the same time....
>>>>
>>>> Petri
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan Roberts wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dennis,
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you sure this is really slicehost?  Didn't Rackspace have a Mosso
>>>>> offering like this prior to slicehost?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just curious...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Dennis J Harrison Jr
>>>>> <dennisharrison@gmail.com <mailto:dennisharrison@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Just FYI:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Mosso is the offering from rackspace based on their purchase of
>>>>>     slicehost last year.  It is cheaper then slicehost and the testmaker
>>>>>     tests we have running for freeswitch, apache and python are showing
>>>>>     that we are about 22% faster on the 15.5gb vm from mosso as opposed
>>>>> to
>>>>>     the 15.5gb slice we have at slicehost.
>>>>>
>>>>>     I am really surprised by this, because rdns for everything at mosso
>>>>> is
>>>>>     slicehost.  And I know it's a one-off...  Although the dns tool at
>>>>>     mosso sucks in comparison to everything else i've seen :)
>>>>>
>>>>>     Anyhow, I know there are a few devs on the list.  Who knows how long
>>>>>     performance will be acceptable before they overcrowd the servers.
>>>>>     They seem to be using an ultra patched xen 3.2 as the hypervisors,
>>>>> so
>>>>>     hopefully the cpu pri gets tuned well enough per domU.
>>>>>     ___________________
>>>>>     Nolug mailing list
>>>>>     nolug@nolug.org <mailto:nolug@nolug.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>>>> is
>>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>>
>>>> ___________________
>>>> Nolug mailing list
>>>> nolug@nolug.org
>>>>
>>>
>> ___________________
>> Nolug mailing list
>> nolug@nolug.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 04/29/09