You don't know very much about corporate change control,
prioritization, QA, etc, etc, etc.
On 2010-01-05 16:05, Techmaster wrote:
> Nope, it affects Windows XP as well. The sad part is it probably took
> longer to make that web page with that answer on it, than it would
> have taken to just patch the source of chkdsk and recompile it.
>
> I just ran into this exact issue, which is how I found MS's proposed
> solution. I instead booted up an Ubuntu Live CD and deleted the files
> on the first try. :) Kind of sad that Linux now does NTFS better
> than Windows does it. For the longest time, NTFS was read-only in
> Linux.
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:
>> On 2010-01-05 15:24, Techmaster wrote:
>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246026
>>>
>>> Does anybody else see the problem with this? Some unimportant files
>>> get corrupted, but the fix is to backup, format, and restore
>>> everything but the corrupted files? LOL
>> To me, that seems a perfectly rational solution. After all, what should a
>> Linux user do if the inode table gets corrupted.
>>
>> The *real* stupidity is:
>> NTFS supports case-sensitive (POSIX) file names, but Chkdsk does
>> not check file names in case-sensitive mode.
>>
>> Since this only affects versions up to Win2k, they apparently fixed chkdsk
>> for XP.
>>
-- "Hell hath no fury like the vast robot armies of a woman scorned." Walt ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 01/05/10
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 01/05/10 EST