On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 14:29, bad-magic-number wrote:
> > Thou spake:
[snip]
>
> Yeppers, OS X is based on the BSDs kernels, specifically FreBSD (bleh, but I
> won't complain). Its not very visible under Aqua, but if you are like me and use
> the shell 90% of the time, you start to notice that everything has the BSD feel
> (flags, etc.).
If 90% of you time is at the shell, then why not get a 2GHz x86 box?
For the same $2,499 cost of the "Faster" G4 box, you could stuff a
whole lot into a clone box...
If the choice was only between OSX and Wintel, the choice would
be difficult, but with Linux & *BSD running on x86, how does
OSX perform substantially better, except in niche markets?
-- +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ron Johnson, Jr. mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net | | Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson | | | | "they love our milk and honey, but preach about another | | way of living" | | Merle Haggard, "The Fighting Side Of Me" | +------------------------------------------------------------+ ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 11/03/02
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST