There are no good operators here in U.S.
I've used most of them available in this area for the past 10 years.
Both carriers now carry Android phones and do cripple them to a degree
like any other phones they carry.
Verizon Pros: Reasonably good voice coverage in rural areas.
Verizon Cons: Too many to list. Most prominent is the extreme control
and censorship
T-Mo Pros: GSM, HSPA in cities Not awfully expensive (depends on the needs)
T-Mo Cons: Spotty coverage in some cities such as New Orleans (Unless
it has improved since the latest tower upgrades), Non-motorola Android
phones.
P
On 10/11/10, Curtis "cSc" Smith <kman922002@gmail.com> wrote:
> They did when I was in Canada so I'd assume so
>
> On 10/11/10, Joey Kelly <joey@joeykelly.net> wrote:
>> On Mon October 11 2010 3:46 pm, Lee S. Whatley wrote:
>>> Sound quality is good,
>>> but signal quality is awful. There are spots on I-10 near the LA-MS
>>> line where I get no signal, and I often get no signal inside of
>>> office buildings. In both cases my friends with AT&T get full
>>> signal. For me it is adequate, as I am a cheapskate.
>>
>> That raises a question: both T-mobile and AT&T are GSM systems. Do
>> T-mobile
>> handsets roam or whatever to AT&T towers?
>>
>> --
>> Joey Kelly
>> Minister of the Gospel and Linux Consultant
>> http://joeykelly.net
>> 504-239-6550
>> ___________________
>> Nolug mailing list
>> nolug@nolug.org
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> - cSc
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 10/12/10
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 10/12/10 EDT