Answer to the actual question is. Go for it. Drop Verizon!
Get the nokia N900. We'll play with it :-)
On 10/12/10, Petri Laihonen <pietu@weblizards.net> wrote:
> There are no good operators here in U.S.
> I've used most of them available in this area for the past 10 years.
>
> Both carriers now carry Android phones and do cripple them to a degree
> like any other phones they carry.
>
> Verizon Pros: Reasonably good voice coverage in rural areas.
> Verizon Cons: Too many to list. Most prominent is the extreme control
> and censorship
>
> T-Mo Pros: GSM, HSPA in cities Not awfully expensive (depends on the needs)
> T-Mo Cons: Spotty coverage in some cities such as New Orleans (Unless
> it has improved since the latest tower upgrades), Non-motorola Android
> phones.
>
> P
>
> On 10/11/10, Curtis "cSc" Smith <kman922002@gmail.com> wrote:
>> They did when I was in Canada so I'd assume so
>>
>> On 10/11/10, Joey Kelly <joey@joeykelly.net> wrote:
>>> On Mon October 11 2010 3:46 pm, Lee S. Whatley wrote:
>>>> Sound quality is good,
>>>> but signal quality is awful. There are spots on I-10 near the LA-MS
>>>> line where I get no signal, and I often get no signal inside of
>>>> office buildings. In both cases my friends with AT&T get full
>>>> signal. For me it is adequate, as I am a cheapskate.
>>>
>>> That raises a question: both T-mobile and AT&T are GSM systems. Do
>>> T-mobile
>>> handsets roam or whatever to AT&T towers?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joey Kelly
>>> Minister of the Gospel and Linux Consultant
>>> http://joeykelly.net
>>> 504-239-6550
>>> ___________________
>>> Nolug mailing list
>>> nolug@nolug.org
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my mobile device
>>
>> - cSc
>> ___________________
>> Nolug mailing list
>> nolug@nolug.org
>>
>
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 10/12/10
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 10/12/10 EDT