On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 07:23, the Professor wrote:
> > (YES, OS X will be my platform of choice due to the better hardware)
>
> This is an interesting comment.
>
> You see, you must be the only person that holds this opinion. Apple is
> quite upset with Motorola for failing to provide hardware that can keep up
> with Intel. They are so upset that the next version of MacOS is seriously
> being considered for deployment on PC hardware. So, if the hardware is
> better, why is Apple so upset with Motorola? Personally, I agree that the
Well, it runs more efficiently (MIPS/cycle) and lots cooler...
However, yes, Mot is lagging in the GHz department. I've heard,
though, that part of the Power contract between Apple, IBM & Motorola
stipulates that IBMs chips always be a few generations faster than
Mot's chips. My guess is that IBM wanted to protect the RS/6000 from
low-end encroachment.
> software runs much more stably than M$ but that doesn't take much. I think
> that the decision to run on PC hardware comes many moons too late. They
> should have done it a number of years ago.
I wonder if they would use generic mobos, or customized ones with
their own ASICs?
-- +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ron Johnson, Jr. mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net | | Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson | | | | "they love our milk and honey, but preach about another | | way of living" | | Merle Haggard, "The Fighting Side Of Me" | +------------------------------------------------------------+ ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 11/04/02
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST