Re: [Nolug] linux and netapp

From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson_at_cox.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:45:24 -0500
Message-ID: <51F14814.2080506@cox.net>

What happened to "report disk full and make the application programmer do
the right thing"?

On 07/25/2013 08:47 AM, Jj Gmail wrote:
> All other sans I have worked with, emc, IBM fastt, the operating system
> would report disk full and kill the process. Is Netapp different or is
> there a configuration.
>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 7:38 PM, Scott Harney <scotth@scottharney.com
> <mailto:scotth@scottharney.com>> wrote:
>
>> What jimmy says is accurate. If you entirely fill up a lun on netapp,
>> data ontap (netapp os) will take the lun offline from the host to prevent
>> data loss and/or corruption.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, June 21, 2013, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>>
>> On 6/20/13, j j <jdj2005@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > Anyone else have any experience with linux connected to a netapp
>> san? I
>> > have had 2 seperate occaisions where a data lun, with no os or
>> > page partitions on it, filled up and hung the server. Trying to
>> figure out
>>
>> Usually... if the disk space available for a LUN runs out, and writes
>> can no longer be accepted, there are going to be problems regardless
>> of what operating system or client hardware has the initiator using
>> that LUN.....
>>
>>
>> > if it is a CISCO UCS blade, Netapp, or combination of both issue. Don't
>> > think it is red hat.
>>

-- 
"Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur"
Petronius
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 07/25/13

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 07/25/13 EDT