Re: Re: [Nolug] Re: cable modems

From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson_at_cox.net>
Date: 27 Jan 2003 18:58:52 -0600
Message-Id: <1043715532.9896.114.camel@haggis>

On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 17:08, pcguy1@cox.net wrote:
> Yes, we are blocking 25 & 80, and 1434.

Is there any chance that 25 & 80 will be un-blocked, and, say monitoring
installed, so that only the abusers (i.e. high traffic http & smtp) or
people who've been hacked (and are now spewing forth nimda, code red,
etc) would get zapped?

You'd get a lot more customers that way. Well, mostly geeks, but they
pay too !!

> > From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
> > Date: 2003/01/27 Mon PM 04:16:10 EST
> > To: NOLUG ML <nolug@joeykelly.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Nolug] Re: cable modems
> >
> > Hi, Charles.
> >
> > While we've got you on the line: does Cox still block ports 80 & 25?
> >
> > Of course, none of us would mind if you blocked 1434...

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.        mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net          |
| Jefferson, LA  USA      http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|                                                               |
| "Fear the Penguin!!"                                          |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 01/27/03

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST