On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 19:00, Andrew S. Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2003 06:39 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > But... Since Oracle licenses are based per-CPU, we look for getting
> > faster CPUs inside the same box, instead of more of the same speed
> > CPUs, when upgrading.
>
> True, now, but they've changed their licensing more than once in the past.
> I thought that they were currently licensing on "processor units" or something
> like that, where you take the processor speed time the number of processors
> time X dollars. Since we have a corporate agreement, I don't have to worry
> about the details anymore.
Lucky you. When we were a division of Lockheed Martin we also did, but
not anymore...
> > However, I'm "efforting" to convince my boss that the "Unix people"
> > should try developing on Linux instead of HP-UX. Thus, that's why
> > I started the thread "white papers to show my CIO regarding Linux,
> > Unix & Oracle" in the 1st place.
>
> I haven't checked Oracle's web site lately, but they never lacked for
> whitepapers in the past. What other "sources" does your CIO consider
> "reputable?" Gartner, IDC, ??? Others I don't know?
Any BigCorp or analyst firm would do...
-- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net | | Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson | | | | An ad currently being run by the NEA (the US's biggest | | public school TEACHERS UNION) asks a teenager if he can | | find sodium and *chloride* in the periodic table of the | | elements. | | And they wonder why people think public schools suck... | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 05/01/03
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST