RE: [Nolug] First e-mail now DNS

as you can see www.fommy.com and fommy.com gives the same response. If your
that upset with Cox that you have to bring up minor points like this, cancel
your service. IMHO

; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> www.fommy.com
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 29951
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.fommy.com. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.fommy.com. 86400 IN CNAME fommy.com.
fommy.com. 83997 IN A 161.58.7.191

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
fommy.com. 83997 IN NS ns1.secure.net.
fommy.com. 83997 IN NS ns2.secure.net.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.secure.net. 153064 IN A 192.220.124.10
ns2.secure.net. 153064 IN A 192.220.125.10

;; Query time: 55 msec
;; SERVER: 205.152.132.254#53(205.152.132.254)
;; WHEN: Thu Jun 19 08:51:08 2003
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 152

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nolug@joeykelly.net [mailto:owner-nolug@joeykelly.net]On
Behalf Of Pietu
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:30 AM
To: nolug@joeykelly.net
Subject: RE: [Nolug] First e-mail now DNS

It doesn't matter what "fommy.com" is using as IP.
I'm trying to reach "www.fommy.com" and the subdomain "www" could be
configured to work from another side of the globe with different IP.

However, www seems to be working now again. But my main point was that where
is the reliability with the service I pay for. That's also old thing and
probably never change.

P

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nolug@joeykelly.net [mailto:owner-nolug@joeykelly.net]On
> Behalf Of Robert Cochran
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:06 AM
> To: nolug@joeykelly.net
> Subject: RE: [Nolug] First e-mail now DNS
>
>
> Looks to me like cox's DNS server is correct and that Texas DNS server is
> still waiting for the record to recurse, either way it brings to the same
> ringtones site.
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> fommy.com
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 9539
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;fommy.com. IN A
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> fommy.com. 86250 IN A 161.58.7.191
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> fommy.com. 86250 IN NS ns1.secure.net.
> fommy.com. 86250 IN NS ns2.secure.net.
>
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> ns1.secure.net. 155317 IN A 192.220.124.10
> ns2.secure.net. 155317 IN A 192.220.125.10
>
> ;; Query time: 4 msec
> ;; SERVER: 205.152.132.254#53(205.152.132.254)
> ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 19 08:13:33 2003
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 121
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nolug@joeykelly.net [mailto:owner-nolug@joeykelly.net]On
> Behalf Of Pietu
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:46 AM
> To: nolug@joeykelly.net
> Subject: [Nolug] First e-mail now DNS
>
>
>
> Cox is failing again....
>
> I'm really getting worried about the need to move somewhere else since
> unfortunately cox is the only ISP in jefferson area where I live.
>
> As everybody knows, they screwed up my ability to send e-mails without me
> doing any tricks.
>
> Now the DNS is haywired. When ever it is not timing out, it gives
> unreliable
> results. Today I suddenly lost the ability to browse one website
> I needed to
> check.
>
> Cox's DNS gives the IP address 161.58.7.191
> and my server's DNS in texas gives 198.170.243.244. <-- the
> correct one. for
> the website.
>
> Jihuu......we'll see what happens next. Hopefully somebody fixes something
> there.
>
> Tunneling port 80 through SSH is a bit more difficult than e-mail. Unless
> you are willing to change the settings with every click.
>
> P
>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service for the Archdiocese of New Orleans. For
> further information visit
> http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service for the Archdiocese of New
> Orleans. For further information visit
> http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>

___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service for the Archdiocese of New Orleans. For
further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service for the Archdiocese of New Orleans. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp

___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 06/19/03