RE: [Nolug] First e-mail now DNS

Seems like they are just lazy to update the DNS records.

Btw. I'll cancel immediately when there is an alternative for the same price
point. Don't even have to be 3Meg d/l.

P

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nolug@joeykelly.net [mailto:owner-nolug@joeykelly.net]On
> Behalf Of Robert Cochran
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:47 AM
> To: nolug@joeykelly.net
> Subject: RE: [Nolug] First e-mail now DNS
>
>
> as you can see www.fommy.com and fommy.com gives the same
> response. If your
> that upset with Cox that you have to bring up minor points like
> this, cancel
> your service. IMHO
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> www.fommy.com
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 29951
> ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;www.fommy.com. IN A
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> www.fommy.com. 86400 IN CNAME fommy.com.
> fommy.com. 83997 IN A 161.58.7.191
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> fommy.com. 83997 IN NS ns1.secure.net.
> fommy.com. 83997 IN NS ns2.secure.net.
>
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> ns1.secure.net. 153064 IN A 192.220.124.10
> ns2.secure.net. 153064 IN A 192.220.125.10
>
> ;; Query time: 55 msec
> ;; SERVER: 205.152.132.254#53(205.152.132.254)
> ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 19 08:51:08 2003
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 152
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nolug@joeykelly.net [mailto:owner-nolug@joeykelly.net]On
> Behalf Of Pietu
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:30 AM
> To: nolug@joeykelly.net
> Subject: RE: [Nolug] First e-mail now DNS
>
>
> It doesn't matter what "fommy.com" is using as IP.
> I'm trying to reach "www.fommy.com" and the subdomain "www" could be
> configured to work from another side of the globe with different IP.
>
> However, www seems to be working now again. But my main point was
> that where
> is the reliability with the service I pay for. That's also old thing and
> probably never change.
>
> P
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nolug@joeykelly.net [mailto:owner-nolug@joeykelly.net]On
> > Behalf Of Robert Cochran
> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:06 AM
> > To: nolug@joeykelly.net
> > Subject: RE: [Nolug] First e-mail now DNS
> >
> >
> > Looks to me like cox's DNS server is correct and that Texas DNS
> server is
> > still waiting for the record to recurse, either way it brings
> to the same
> > ringtones site.
> >
> > ; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> fommy.com
> > ;; global options: printcmd
> > ;; Got answer:
> > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 9539
> > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
> >
> > ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> > ;fommy.com. IN A
> >
> > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> > fommy.com. 86250 IN A 161.58.7.191
> >
> > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> > fommy.com. 86250 IN NS ns1.secure.net.
> > fommy.com. 86250 IN NS ns2.secure.net.
> >
> > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> > ns1.secure.net. 155317 IN A 192.220.124.10
> > ns2.secure.net. 155317 IN A 192.220.125.10
> >
> > ;; Query time: 4 msec
> > ;; SERVER: 205.152.132.254#53(205.152.132.254)
> > ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 19 08:13:33 2003
> > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 121
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nolug@joeykelly.net [mailto:owner-nolug@joeykelly.net]On
> > Behalf Of Pietu
> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:46 AM
> > To: nolug@joeykelly.net
> > Subject: [Nolug] First e-mail now DNS
> >
> >
> >
> > Cox is failing again....
> >
> > I'm really getting worried about the need to move somewhere else since
> > unfortunately cox is the only ISP in jefferson area where I live.
> >
> > As everybody knows, they screwed up my ability to send e-mails
> without me
> > doing any tricks.
> >
> > Now the DNS is haywired. When ever it is not timing out, it gives
> > unreliable
> > results. Today I suddenly lost the ability to browse one website
> > I needed to
> > check.
> >
> > Cox's DNS gives the IP address 161.58.7.191
> > and my server's DNS in texas gives 198.170.243.244. <-- the
> > correct one. for
> > the website.
> >
> > Jihuu......we'll see what happens next. Hopefully somebody
> fixes something
> > there.
> >
> > Tunneling port 80 through SSH is a bit more difficult than
> e-mail. Unless
> > you are willing to change the settings with every click.
> >
> > P
> >
> > ___________________
> > Nolug mailing list
> > nolug@nolug.org
> >
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> > MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service for the Archdiocese of New
> Orleans. For
> > further information visit
> > http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
> >
> >
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> > MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service for the Archdiocese of New
> > Orleans. For further information visit
> > http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
> >
> > ___________________
> > Nolug mailing list
> > nolug@nolug.org
> >
>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service for the Archdiocese of New Orleans. For
> further information visit
> http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service for the Archdiocese of New
> Orleans. For further information visit
> http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org
>

___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 06/19/03