Re: [Nolug] Spam and Virus Protection

From: -ray <ray_at_ops.selu.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:43:05 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307100036490.31634-100000@romulus.csd.selu.edu>

On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:

> I've had my own problems with OpenLDAP, so I don't doubt what you
> say, but I am curious about when you did the testing. The code has
> really matured in the past year.

Well as luck would have it, most of the testing was done right at a year
ago (last summer). I don't doubt the code has matured a lot.

> Also, I would love to have the scalability problem, but I don't right
> now. I wonder if I can just stuff it with a bunch of objects to test
> this out.

That's what we did, knowing we wouldn't need to scale as big as we tested.
Good to know eDir held up anyway... we have a little over 100,000 objects
in the db now. We'll have to make some rrdtool graphs to see how many
queries per second we do.

> OpenLDAP has a variety of backends that it can run on. These include
> Berkley DB's, SQL databases, other LDAP stores, shell scripts, perl
> modules (via the embedable Perl interpreter) and others. I'm not
> sure what you mean by "flat files" but I don't think any of these
> qualify.

We were using the default, which i guess is one of the BerkleyDB formats?

> > I wrote a script that runs freshclam nightly to update the db, and mails
> > me the result based on the exit code from freshclam.
>
> That's standard on Debian... I wonder if I just missed the updates.
> Or maybe it was longer than I thought when I last checked.

It was updated again tonight, July 10.

-ray

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ray DeJean  				       	 http://www.r-a-y.org
Systems Engineer                    Southeastern Louisiana University
IBM Certified Specialist  	      AIX Administration, AIX Support
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 07/10/03

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST