Re: [Nolug] Gentoo?

From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson_at_cox.net>
Date: 02 Aug 2003 18:32:41 -0500
Message-Id: <1059867161.24818.92.camel@haggis>

On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 18:13, -ray wrote:
> hasn't this happened before? We start talking about something and
> the next day it shows up on slashdot...cool
>
> Developers: Measuring The Benefits Of The Gentoo Approach
> http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=227
>
> "We're constantly hearing how the source based nature of the Gentoo distro
> makes better use of your hardware, but no-one seems to have really tested
> it. What kind of gains are involved over distros which use binary
> packaging? The article is here."

That's a black eye for Gentoo...

Mplayer results would have been interesting, though.

> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, -ray wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Alex wrote:
> >
> > > I can qualitatively ;) say that I get better performance after compiling
> > > X and the kernel, but I believe a lot of that is because the Crusoe
> > > emulates the i386. And if you already have a slow disk. and/or your ram
> > > is maxed out, which is the case for most laptops...then you want to
> > > squeeze everything out of it, right?

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.        Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net             |
| Jefferson, LA  USA                                              |
|                                                                 |
| "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals, I'm a vegetarian  |
|  because I hate vegetables!"                                    |
|    unknown                                                      |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 08/02/03

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST