Was't Hitler a socialist?
(Hello, Mikey!)
Ok, that wasn't fair ;-)
On a related note, I posted a timely troll to slashdot the other day:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=84151&cid=7352347
...only I was being serious. I can't stomach elitism when it comes to distros.
I can sympathize with the zealots on this issue; however, I get highly
irritated when *some* make comments insinuating that I'm selling out because
I choose to run something else besides the One True Distro (be that a Linux
distro, or a *BSD). I preach against the Evil Empire, I advocate the use of
OSS whenever possible.. I even started a company marketing Linux over Windows
(probably too strongly for some people's tastes, but hey, it's my company).
I'm a Believer, I've got the credentials to prove it. I'm not one of those
wild religious fanatics, though (I'm still speaking about computers here, in
case anyone's getting worried). I think some people have a tendency to lose
sight of reality now and then.
--Joey
Thou spake:
>Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
>> Well, if you're not a drone, "socialist" has a pretty specific
>> meaning (try 'dict socialist'). Same with "free enterprise".
>
>$ dict socialist
>[...]
> One who advocates or practices the doctrines of socialism.
>[...]
>
> # That didn't help much.
>$ dict socialism
>[...]
> a political theory advocating state ownership of industry
>[...]
>
>Your original statement was:
>> Or, are you a socialist (it's a free country*, after all), and
>> dislike free enterprise?
>
-- Joey Kelly < Minister of the Gospel | Computer Networking Consultant > http://joeykelly.net ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 11/06/03
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST