Re: [Nolug] Vector Linux SOHO

From: Dave Prentice <prentice_at_instruction.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:21:17 -0600
Message-ID: <01c40d58$dc296500$6500000a@Dave.HOME>

You're right, it did see all 96. Thanks.
Dave Prentice
prentice@instruction.com
http://www.originsresource.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Manuel Lora <vanguardist@cox.net>
To: nolug@joeykelly.net <nolug@joeykelly.net>
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2004 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Nolug] Vector Linux SOHO

>use 'free' at a console and check to make sure. sometimes those
frontend apps
>are kinda finicky. maybe linux has already recognized all 96.
>
>ml
>
>On Thursday 18 March 2004 06:24 pm, Dave Prentice wrote:
>> Alex,
>> So far so good. No blazing speed, but it works OK. On the
"System
>> Monitor" display at the bottom of the KDE screen, though, it only
>> shows 36meg of memory. Do I need to modify LILO somehow to let it
know
>> there's 96 meg? Seems like an old version of RH required that, but
I
>> can't remember the details.
>> Thanks.
>> Dave Prentice
>> prentice@instruction.com
>> http://www.originsresource.org
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alex McKenzie <alex@boxchain.com>
>> To: nolug@joeykelly.net <nolug@joeykelly.net>
>> Date: Thursday, March 18, 2004 7:24 AM
>> Subject: [Nolug] Vector Linux SOHO
>>
>> >Never heard of it. Good luck :)
>> >Oh, and let me know how OOo works with 96 MB.
>> >--
>> >Alex McKenzie alex@boxchain.com http://www.boxchain.com
>> >
>> >Dave Prentice wrote:
>> >> Alex,
>> >> On your recommendation I'm going to try Vector Linux SOHO on
>>
>> this
>>
>> >> laptop. It's a version of slackware that's supposed to run with
>> >> minimal hardware. Will let you know how it works. That way I can
>>
>> blame
>>
>> >> you if anything goes wrong. ;)
>> >> Dave Prentice
>> >> prentice@instruction.com
>>
>> ___________________
>> Nolug mailing list
>> nolug@nolug.org
>___________________
>Nolug mailing list
>nolug@nolug.org

___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 03/18/04

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST