Re: [Nolug] redhat upgrade for web server

From: John D. Tiedeman <jdtiede_at_sstar.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:47:42 -0500
Message-ID: <40E172FE.3070907@sstar.com>

Ron Johnson wrote:

>On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 17:32 -0500, -ray wrote:
>
>
>>And i would not put a new box in production at RH9.0, since it's been
>>discontinued. If you're sticking with Redhat (and don't have issues with
>>a 2.6 kernel), i would go with Fedora Core 2.
>>
>>
>
>Note that RH doesn't offer support of FC.
>
>If you want support, security fixes, etc in the RPM world, go with
>Progeny or SuSE.
>http://transition.progeny.com/
>
>Of course, Real Geeks would go to Debian, or it's cousin, Libranet
>2.8.1. It's got a GUI installer, and if the package versions are
>too old, you can migrate to straight Debian.
>http://www.libranet.com/features.html
>
>
>
FC is user-supported, which doesn't seem to be a disadvantage.
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 06/29/04

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST