Re: [Nolug] networking question

From: Friedrich Gurtler <fgurtler_at_tulane.edu>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 14:43:18 -0500
Message-ID: <4113DF56.30709@tulane.edu>

http://www.linux.ie/pipermail/ilug/2004-June/016144.html

That thread help any?

Joey Kelly wrote:

>On Friday 06 August 2004 2:23 pm, Friedrich Gurtler spake:
>
>
>>Stupid question, but if you are going to forward all the ports, why not
>>just put it on the other side of your linux box?
>>
>>ISP--------- Linux box
>>
>> | -------other box
>>
>>Is that what you are ruling out when you say the existing nat has to
>>stay in place? Whats the reasoning behind it? (Just curious)
>>
>>
>
>Nope, it's not possible to do that. The server resides in on location, and
>another location needs to access it. It's an AS/400, so while I've tried to
>forward telnet to the box, apparently it needs more than just that for
>everything to work correctly. While forwarding selected ports is what I'd
>rather do, it's going to be simpler to just stick the box on the net, having
>it appear to be on a real IP, while remaining on a private IP so the host
>location can continue to access it. I'm going to effectively forward all
>possible ports to the box.
>
>
>
>
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 08/06/04

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST