John Souvestre wrote:
>
> I agree with you, however:
>
> 1) A router should not drop even low priority traffic, in general. Certainly
> not 15%.
Ideally, yes, you shouldn't see a loss of low priority traffic that
high. However, without knowing exactly how Cox has their equipment
setup, especially customer counts per node, its all "academic." I
agree that 15% is way too high for even low priority traffic, but I'm
used to networks that run in far more ideal situations...
>
> 2) If you have just local packet loss due to a periodic problem it is a safe
> bet to say that under peak loads the router is going to lose routed packets
> also.
Certainly...
Jeremy
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 03/15/05
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST