John Souvestre wrote:
> Hi Brett.
> 
> I don't agree.  :-)  The City decided to position themselves as a competitor
> to BellSouth and other ISP's (me included).  I don't see anything fair about a
> tax subsidized monopoly as a competitor.
> 
> John
> 
The thing, however, is that most people aren't going to be jumping ship 
from traditional providers like you, Cox, Bellsouth and others in 
droves.   I've been arguing this point in the Bellsouth forum on a 
certain website with the Bellsouth employees.
San Francisco has a nearly city-wide WIFI network provided by BARWN and 
IA that offers access for free and has a nice, fat, 10-100Mbps pipe for 
said WIFI network.   Very few people jumped ship and went with their 
network, and those that did, were not even remotely close to being an 
average Jow user.   The predictions that Cox, Bellsouth and others are 
going to loose lots of customers are, based on what I've seen in other 
cities, crying about the sky falling...
Honestly, for me, this is freakin' cool.    Now if I am in the city and 
get lost or need to access the internet to get a phone number, all I 
have to do is pull over, fire up the laptop and boom, I get what I need. 
   There really aren't any data packages for mobile users like me that 
aren't priced at a reasonable point.   I mean, there's Verizon, but I 
don't wouldn't use it enough to justify the expense.
BTW, isn't Bellsouth a tax subsidized monopoly on the last mile telco 
infrastructure?  ;)
Jeremy
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 12/05/05
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST