The bandwidth throttling works remarkably well, and they also have a linux version. All servers can be managed remotely through a single tcp port. They also have a "data rewind" feature to roll back synched garbage. If the master server breaks, so will the DR site, so it is important to have the ability to go back in time. However, none of these solutions replace backup and data archive solutions, IMHO.
-----
John Fox - BlackBerry
(504) 931-8200
----- Original Message -----
From: owner-nolug@redfishnetworks.com <owner-nolug@redfishnetworks.com>
To: nolug@nolug.org <nolug@nolug.org>
Sent: Thu Jul 05 22:27:37 2007
Subject: Re: [Nolug] OT: Windows Data replication Software
Simon Dorfman wrote:
> I'm researching options for setting up a remote Windows 2003 Server for use
> during a hurricane evacuation. I want something that will copy data from
> the server on our LAN to the remote server (Dallas co-lo), as files are
> changed. Or, if that's too expensive, every night, do a data sync.
>
> Does anyone have any experience with these two data replication apps? If
> yes, any feedback?:
> PeerSync
> http://www.peersoftware.com/solutions/peersync/server_mirroring_solutions.as
> p
>
> PowerFolder
> http://www.powerfolder.com/
>
> Any other solution ideas? Maybe rsync for windows via SSH? Anyone set
> anything like that up?
>
> Thanks,
> Simon
>
I am going to second to recommendation of WANsync as a possible
solution, albeit a VERY pricey one (~ $3000). We use it to keep data
synchronized for a major law that is currently handling billions in
flood claims. The software works VERY well. Supposedly, you can also
limit its bandwidth so that it doesn't saturate the pipe if you have it
setup to run constantly (synchronizing on the fly).
Jeremy
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 07/06/07
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST