At 10:47 PM 5/22/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 22:34, Craig Jackson wrote:
> > 100% Windows -- ugh. (how much longer can I take this torture? I don't
> > know) But, if they say have email hosted, and I can't talk them out of
> > it, dammit, I'll have it hosted at a Linux site.
>
>They want to host _internal_ email at a remote hosting facility??
>Wow....
>
>I just might start my own company, too, just to host it. No
>sense sending their email 1/2 way across the country, when I
>can spy on it in my bedroom...
You may be surprised at how popular this is becoming. There is a bit of a
move these days to push services, even services we would consider core to
our infrastructure, such as mail and DNS, to an external provider. It makes
sense in a lot of situations.
Now, mixing up email and groupware is new to me. That will be interesting.
I am curious to know how this turns out.
I remember seeing a thread on a SAGE mailing list a while back about some
new Exchange killers (they may have even run on UNIX and/or Linux). Craig,
did you want me to dig this up?
Regards, Dustin
--- Dustin Puryear <dpuryear@usa.net> UNIX and Network Consultant http://members.telocity.com/~dpuryear PGP Key available at http://www.us.pgp.net In the beginning the Universe was created. This has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 05/23/02
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST