> It's all a matter of scale. But even at your size (and plz don't
> think I dismiss it, because your "small" amount of important data is
> just as important to you as our terabytes), I'd use PostgreSQL, since
> it doesn't have the egregious data loss problems that MySQL has.
>
That would be an enormous task to convert almost every single script in
our backend and all the web/wap sites to use postgres. For now, Mysql
will do....
And yes, I know 1.5 million records is not much, and so far the most
records we've racked up is somewhere between 50-60 million. And then the
acctual binary data takes only about 100Gb.
P
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 12/07/08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST