Scott Cotton <scott@nscotton.com> writes:
> I'm just saying the current tax code is really complex and requires alot of
> studing to actually get right. There are reasons why we have attoreneys and
> cpas. They aren't just for big corporations are they not? =)
It does require studying. And lawyers and CPAs do have their uses.
However, all the information available from the IRS is available on
their website, so there is no reason that a simple request for
information should need a specialized person to answer it.
My objection was mostly that the information being requested regarding
1099s was the sort that didn't require any redirection to a specialist.
For example, all my income last year was on a 1099 basis and I don't use
an accountant or lawyer to fill out my taxes. I was doing my own taxes
before my wife started working with the IRS's VITA program. A 1099 is
not a scary, secret document that requires esoteric knowledge.
(Since I mentioned in another post that I'm Wikimedia's Bugmeister, I
should point out here that I'm doing that work as an employee, not a
1099 contractor. Last year I was a working as a developer for them on a
contract basis before they made the decision to hire me as a (for now)
temporary, hopefully to become permanent soon, employee.)
Mark.
-- http://hexmode.com/ War begins by calling for the annihilation of the Other, but ends ultimately in self-annihilation. ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 04/12/11
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 04/12/11 EDT